Table 2 |
||||||
|
Comparative results for the considered HP sequences |
||||||
|
Inst. |
Length |
E* |
Proposed Method (EAHCD) |
Genetic Algorithms |
Pull Move-GAs |
MultimemeAlgorithms |
|
|
||||||
|
S1 |
20 |
-9 |
-9 |
-9 |
-9 |
-9 |
|
S2 |
24 |
-9 |
-9 |
-9 |
-9 |
|
|
S3 |
25 |
-8 |
-8 |
-8 |
-8 |
-8 |
|
S4 |
36 |
-14 |
-14 |
-14 |
-14 |
-14 |
|
S5 |
48 |
-23 |
-23 |
-22 |
-22 |
-22 |
|
S6 |
50 |
-21 |
-21 |
-21 |
-21 |
-21 |
|
S7 |
60 |
-36 |
-35 |
-34 |
-34 |
|
|
S8 |
64 |
-42 |
-39 |
-37 |
-38 |
-39 |
|
|
||||||
|
Chira et al. BioData Mining 2011 4:23 doi:10.1186/1756-0381-4-23 |
||||||
