|
Benchmark results. |
||||
| Measure |
Number of GO terms |
csbl.go |
GOSim (vs. csbl.go) |
SemSim (vs. csbl.go) |
|
|
||||
| Resnik |
50 |
0.002 s |
4.9 s (2399 ×) |
4.5 s (2158 ×) |
| Resnik |
100 |
0.006 s |
19.5 s (3219 ×) |
17.4 s (2880 ×) |
| Resnik |
200 |
0.024 s |
77.8 s (3245 ×) |
71.0 s (2963 ×) |
| Lin |
50 |
0.002 s |
7.4 s (3612 ×) |
4.5 s (2167 ×) |
| Lin |
100 |
0.007 s |
29.5 s (4284 ×) |
17.4 s (2528 ×) |
| Lin |
200 |
0.024 s |
117.8 s (4894 ×) |
71.0 s (2950 ×) |
| Jiang-Conrath |
50 |
0.002 s |
7.4 s (3590 ×) |
4.5 s (2157 ×) |
| Jiang-Conrath |
100 |
0.007 s |
29.5 s (4274 ×) |
17.4 s (2525 ×) |
| Jiang-Conrath |
200 |
0.023 s |
117.5 s (5043 ×) |
70.9 s (3043 ×) |
| Relevance |
50 |
0.002 s |
- |
4.5 s (2062 ×) |
| Relevance |
100 |
0.007 s |
- |
17.4 s (2400 ×) |
| Relevance |
200 |
0.025 s |
- |
71.1 s (2866 ×) |
|
Speed difference between csbl.go and other package is shown in parenthesis. Timings of csbl.go are shown with an accuracy of 1/1000 s. | ||||
Ovaska et al. BioData Mining 2008 1:11 doi:10.1186/1756-0381-1-11 |
||||